Find us on:

Murphy Battista Blog

Road Maintenance Claims -- Kelly v. Perth (County)
September 17, 2014

Road Maintenance Claims — Kelly v. Perth (County)

Sink Hole image

We frequently act in claims where individuals have suffered injuries as a result of terrible road conditions.  Particularly in this country with our weather conditions, perfection in road maintenance is not the standard but the responsible parties must exercise reasonable care in the performance of their duties.

The consequences of the failure to do so were exemplified in a recent case out of Ontario, Kelly v. Perth (County), 2014 ONSC 4151, where a young woman suffered catastrophic injuries after she came upon treacherous road conditions and lost control of her vehicle.  Finding the responsible county wholly responsible for the nearly $6M in damages, the Court concluded:

[103]      I accept that evidence.  Mr. Blancher monitored the weather, conducted an early morning patrol and called out all of the operators who worked on a full-time basis for the County.  The initial response was exactly what the statutory scheme contemplated.

[104]      Unfortunately, the breakdown occurred later in the day and at the operational level.  One employee failed to do his job.  Unfortunately, he was the one person entrusted with the critical job of identifying and remedying road conditions that created an unreasonable risk of harm to users of Line 37.  The failure to patrol, plow or salt had dire consequences.

[105]      Engineer Brian Malone testified at the request of the County.  Mr. Malone’s statement “you can’t catch every snowflake before it hits the ground” is a particularly memorable one.  That is very true.  However, one cannot catch a single snowflake by staying indoors. 

[106]      The inaction of the operator of truck 5 leads to this conclusion: on April 6, 2009 and in relation to Line 37, the County did not do all that was reasonably required of it.  The County cannot avail itself of any of the defences set forth in s. 44(3) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

Share this post:

Facebooktwittergoogle_pluslinkedinmail


Categories
Tags
Disclaimer

Information provided in our blog posts is not intended to be legal advice.

The outcome of every legal proceeding will vary according to the facts and unique circumstances in each individual case. References to successful case results where the lawyers at Murphy Battista LLP have acted for clients are not necessarily a guarantee or indicative of future results.