Reasons on Monday from a 4-day trial in March, 2012: Fancy v. Gareau, 2014 BCSC 584. The plaintiff claimed to be injured in a September, 2008, accident. However, her evidence was wholly inconsistent with forms she had completed for WorkSafeBC regarding a workplace accident she had had some months prior.
 At the very least her evidence as to her symptoms and when they arose are unreliable but, in my view, they are calculated to advance the financial interests of herself and her husband.
Rejecting the plaintiff’s evidence in its entirety, as well as that of her partner, the Court dismissed the claim.
Share this post:
Information provided in our blog posts is not intended to be legal advice.
The outcome of every legal proceeding will vary according to the facts and unique circumstances in each individual case. References to successful case results where the lawyers at Murphy Battista LLP have acted for clients are not necessarily a guarantee or indicative of future results.